[Lee]

Hi Mike,

As regards the ulcer on the fish which you viewed.

The information you provided does not detail the frequency of the pond owners use of the subject product?

Therefore, your pond owner friend may not have been aware that the inventor of Lymnozyme, Jim Keeton, recommends in Tom Lansing's letter that the product remains effective only four days.

Thus, if the pond owner did not use the Lymnozyme with the frequency required of the product it would clearly not have served the expected purpose.

As we know, with any preventative medicine (not that this is a medicine) it's value can only be effective if the directions are meticulously followed.

Therefore, the pond owner may only have used Lymnozyme once a month or even less....And, the period during when he failed to use it, the ponds existant aermonis and/or bacteria found and secured entry and caused the ulcer?

Of course, Mike, I doubt you know the answer to this proposition. However, it is a possibility, isn't it?

Thus, your having told your own personal experience of the ulcered fish may in reality have no basis in fact to the relationship of the effectivness of Lymnozyme?

I ask, ths seriously, as I wonder whether we can find someone who does religiously use Lymnozyme...And, whether it does in fact, work as published?

With my sincerest respects,

Your pal ~

Lee
Grand Cayman