[dinh]

Thanks for posting RHF's message. I'm glad to know his concern in this matter.

Here is Jim's summary post for closing other thread. I wonder why the board will ONLY address the question of liability coverage for KHA pond calls. How about the other points?

================================================== ========================
Topics brought up in this thread that might want to be addressed officially by the AKCA:

Why did the new head of the KHA program say to only buy from BHP certified dealers? (This was answered in this thread but I'm listing it since I am trying to sum this up for everyone.)

Was money diverted from the KHV research fund to fund the BHP program?
If yes...why? It seems that the funds donated to this were supposed to go 100% to research.

Were there any payments made to anyone working on the BHP program? Or perhaps some sort of budget breakdown on the costs related to this project?

Were the KHA's told that they had some sort of liability insurance from the the AKCA when in fact they don't? And if they don't, will they in the future?

Again I am summing up this thread as best as I see. If you think I missed something feel free to PM me.
__________________

Koi-Unit
My personal koi page Updated 7/8/07
ZNA Potomac
================================================== =================================

--Dinh

Quote: Originally Posted by KoiCop Robert H. Finnegan asked me to post this for him: The person who implied that the 'continuation' of the KHA Program was under review by the AKCA Board of Directors was flat wrong and has done a grave disservice to the AKCA, the KHA Program and the many fine folks our program has helped over the years. Only the question of liability coverage for KHA pond calls has ever been on the agenda. The Board will review that item at its meeting on Friday, May 8th. Hopefully, this sets to rest that unfounded rumor. RHF