I have a pond about the same size (I think one ton is 1000 liter???) with a much higher fish load. I have a very simple system (w/o Bakke etc.) and I do not have any problem maintaining the pond.
Dtbh's system has low fish load, therefore, Bakke shower is not really needed and experimental comparison with other filter systems at a meaningful/scientific level is not possible.
Without looking at his system, it appears to me that he needs more plants in his pond to absorb nitrate. Even though he is changing 10% water, production of nitrate in the same period of time is offsetting the water change. Without plant or chemcal means, nitrate would not go down. well, some bacteria can also reduce nitrate.