View Single Post
Old 07-02-2006   #11 (permalink)
koiczar
Oyagoi
 
koiczar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich L
Hi Steve,



Matalla isn't better, other than it's more rigid. That rigidity isn't often needed, J-mat is rigid enough. The different densities diminish one of the benefits of J-mat. A denser media will plug easier and there is less oxygen/surface area. If your oxygen is marginal or the water flow ceases, the oxygen will deplete much faster. Don’t chase that comment on denser media.

Not many old timers bother with Matalla. It’s appears to be something that’s more profitable for dealers.

And J-mat is cheaper.

Now that Russell has straghtened everyone out on the "facts" surrounding cost and square ft/cubic ft ratios, maybe some MORE old timers would want to switch. This old timer is currently using both. I will be replacing the J-mat in my bio tank on my main pond this fall/winter.
koiczar is offline   Reply With Quote