|
Allright, Ive been drifting in this thread for some time now...
I am one of those newbies I guess you all just say "no" to.. and evidently educating people here isn't really what you do (no, believe me, its true, I read it in a post somewhere or other) But I had a couple questions I wanted to throw out... take them or leave them... and feel free to just say "no" because obviously thats what you guys do here, because your so much more informed than everyone else...
Say you have a pond with rocks in it that isnt a "puddle",,, say a pond that's 10x18x5... is this still unacceptable?
to be honest, I was dead set on having a pond with rocks in it, but the idea of a pond with just a liner isn't so rediculus to me anymore...
but the thing is, In this thread, noone has stated why ponds with "rock bottoms" are so bad... sure, watergardens, but not just the pond with rocks in it... If I had just rocks in my pond (my five foot deep one) would it change things SO MUCH as to make it hard for the fish to survive, and throw off the balance of my pond?
thats really what I want to know... If the ROCKS are the actual problem as apposed to the Plants that are normally associated with a pond that has a rock bottom...
thank you.. feel free to say no.....
|