Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 


Welcome to Koi Forum - Koi-Bito Magazine
Go Back   Koi Forum - Koi-Bito Magazine > Hobbyist Koi Forums > General Koi Forum

General Koi Forum The main koi forum. Most posts should be made here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 10-23-2005   #61 (permalink)
Jumbo
 
Tom C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Elliott, I want to thank you for taking the time to post on the board. I'm sorry it had to come to all of this all over one bad pump. From the get go we knew it was bad. Unfortunately the testing at W Lim Corp wasn't adequate testing to find the problem. If anything came out of all of this, I'm sure W Lim Corp. will start testing pumps in other ways to find the true problem with them. I'm sure if you need help with this, Steve will help teach you what you need to know about testing your pumps right.

To Steve and Tim C, thanks for taking your time to test the pump. Also, thank you for being honest that this pump had a problem.
__________________

Keep it simple, keep it straight Koi-Bito.com
Tom C is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005   #62 (permalink)
Honmei
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,526
all I can say is, "HUH?"

Seems like the only one that can even start to ***** about the way the dealer handle his part is the consumer....Now if the person that got this pump can come inhere and say he felt like it should have been the DEALER'S responsibilty to replace the pump then so be it....but I think that the consumer is in agreement with the Dealer that the MANUFACTURER was at fault for not replacing the pump....and if that is the case then, the dealer is not at fault....everyone deciding that anyone else has to do business according their (or Wal-mart's) are being quite self-centered..as if there only way business can be done is by their (and Wal-mart's) way.
Of course should the consumer come in here and say HE felt like the DEALER was responsible, i will gladly retract that the delaer's actions were not poor business policy or procedure.
luke frisbee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005   #63 (permalink)
Tosai
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 23
Luke,

In no way do I find fault with the dealer. He did everything possible to rectify the problem, even taking unwarrranted shots from Lim supporters. He has done many things that they are unaware of, including saving the lives of many of my koi and spending countless hours with me when I had pond problems or sick fish. I think it is unfair that so many Lim supporters bashed my dealer who has more integrity in his little finger than they do in their entire bodies
SCVkoiboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005   #64 (permalink)
Sansai
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 260
Kind of ironic to sit here and complain about us bashing someone when you do the same SCV. I never said tom was a bad person - just that I don't think he lived up to his responsibilities in this case. You sit here and act like everyone has an ulterior motive, and even question the integrity of those who disagree with you. I can assure you junglegeorge is NOT a koiphen supporter or a lim supporter - in fact he's quite the opposite. Yet he agrees that this was the dealer's responsibility. Do you quesiton his integrity too, or just those of us who are active on koiphen?

You will be justified to complain about people bashing others when you stop doing the same. All you're doing now is make yourself look like a hypocrite.
Valarc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005   #65 (permalink)
Tosai
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 23
I never questioned jungle georges integrity. I questioned Steve's and William's.

Quote:
I prefer to do business with people I trust. I certaintly wouldn't buy anything from William or Steve if I ever had to do business with them directly as I don't trust them and I think they lack integrity.
JG simply stated his opinion that he felt the dealer was responsible and I stated that I had a different opinion. Don't make this into more than it is just to stir the pot. Read my responses more carefully, Valarc. I questioned the Lim supporters and you just stated that JG was not a Lim supporter so how did you come to the conclusion that I was attacking JG?

I do believe responsibility has been deflected here (first by putting the responsibility on me for not recognizing William's test to be inappropriate, then putting the blame on Waterways and lastly putting the blame on the dealer). Had the manufacture honored his warrantee from the beginning, we wouldn't even be discussing this here on this Board. But none of you want to discuss his responsibility. Do you think he has NO responsibility here?

I am also not saying that my dealer couldn't have handled it differently. IN fact it would be nice if all dealers handled manufacturer warrantees for their customers as JG stated. My point was that he has done a lot for me and I wanted readers to know that before accusing him of failing to help out his customers.

This whole thing has gotten off track. The end result is that the Dragon pump was defective and it took over two years to get the manufacturer to replace it under warrantee. It has been replaced now. I am happy. Tom C. is happy. Hopefully William Lim is happy that he learned how to test his pumps correctly. Hopefully Steve is happy that he helped others learn more about how to test a pump. And hopefully any further posts will have some value to the original discussion.
SCVkoiboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005   #66 (permalink)
Oyagoi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,228
How to say this nicely...SCV, I understand your emotional attachment to Tom. I also used Ken as an industry example. Every industry has a standard of operating. Tom (if he is the dealer, noone has stated that yet) is operating in another way that is self centered and bad for the customer. HE is outside of the protocol for THIS industry. Cars and cameras are irrelevant. This was a new pump, in another industry. A reputable and integritous dealer/installer in this industry handles it the way ken and I described. I would be nice to you too to wriggle out of buying you a $500 pump until it got warrantied. He should have at least had enough professionalism and sense to keep it off the chat forums. I am not a 'Lim supporter', but I do understand the struggle of small business men and the head games some folks like to play so others look bad when they are gaming and scamming themselves.



I will state it again, IT IS NOT LIM WHO NEEDS TO LEARN TO TEST PUMPS PROPERLY, IT IS YOUR DEALER. I can tell you from his wording on here he did not do that. Steve did. How you can question Steve when he did everyone a favor and told the truth and the whole truth, I do not know. He acted truly porfessinal with NO PAY. You dealer acted unprofessional and received pay. I am sure he will pull the normal skank line and tell you it is because he gave you such a 'good deal and low price' (lol, I have heard that one 1000 times and can smell it from here).

I find it deplorable you would accost Steve's integrity when he stood to gain nothing in this, he acted out of a graciousness to you and for you. He did more for you than your 'integrity filled dealer' did. You should be thanking him. In fact, if your dealer were a real pro, he would have shot over to Lim's before the pump left there the first time and created the conditions with ONE HAND that would have made the pump fail right in front of Lim. Steve or I can tell how to accomplish that in ten seconds, with one hand. That is how professionals handle it. Problem solved in one day. But then, you should have been enjoying your free replacement BEFORE any of that took place, if your dealer had the integrity you want to ascribe to him...
I think you need to unhook your buddy blanket from Tom and look honestly at the situation bro. Steve and Ken are pros in this field who told you how the small guys like themselves do it. In the HVAC, building controls, and energy management research industry, I too met dealers (one man operations is a state many businesses I know of have passed through), who would unload the same crap on customers as Tom is unloading on you. Both big and small companies. They rarely lasted. The integritous contractors never did that and were entrusted with large contracts as a result, in spite of size or personal losses. The thing of not being big enough to do it that way is ludicrous. In fact, better service is one thing smaller guys normally do to build their name. If he continues to do it that way I hope he NEVER gets big enough to do it again, or he will give the whole industry a bad rap.

You may think Steve put Waterway's name up here to shift blame, but I know he did not. He did it to be honest, and to put pressure on Waterway to do something about it so the next guy does not suffer. He did it out of concern for the next small guy and customer. That is how this industry works bro. You think waterway and some of their larger customers and potential customers are not reading this thread? Where do you think product developers go to find out how products are performing? Let me assure you they are reading this.

They need contracts with pump manufacturers and large commercial and government suppliers to prosper and survive themselves. That housing should have been tested before it left their assembly factory. They hurt you and Lim, why is for them to sort out. I am quite sure other folks working to design pumps are reading this and will think hard when choosing a wet end supplier. That is said for the consumer's good.

Larger and higher volume pump manufacturers have to be able to rely on the wet end, with NO errors. Some pumps take two days, a crane, and five men to install. You cannot just pick it up in your hand and run back to the factory to test it. Guys who build those pumps CANNOT have silly errors like this one from their wet end supplier. Period. So Steve did every future customer a favor by posting what he did, and I am quite sure that was his motive, not protecting Lim. He clearly stated he felt Lim and Tom had culpability in this, and he is right. In my view, Tom had more but is dodging it skillfully. Lim should have demanded Tom to come to his shop and show him the failure, it is not his job to search for hours. I too, if a dealer acted like Tom, would question his ability to do a proper install, since 95% of the time the problem when sucking air is leaks in the suctions side piping, or restrictions. If he just handed you a replacement you would burn that one up too if that were the case.

By the way, it still is not Lim's job to test any pumps at all, ever. He makes them, the field guy like Tom tests them and writes the professional diagnosis out for the manufacturer so he does not have to test it. He does not rely on verbal or phone conversations. If done properly, a warranty is issued with no questions. Steve should be thanked for doing Tom's job and writing that out properly so the warranty cannot be questioned. If I were you, I would say thanks to Steve, not question his integrity when Tom's needs some obvious work.
junglegeorge12 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005   #67 (permalink)
Tosai
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. California
Posts: 39
Just of point of clarification on manufacturer warranty protocols. There are several methods that manufacturers utilize to manage defective products. Dealers often must make judgement calls, and deviate from the manufacturer protocols, but these are the "constraints" under which they must operate.

(1) Many manufacturers "authorize" their dealer base to replace defective products on the spot. No phone calls required. Typically, all that is required of the dealer is to return the product later along with a proof of purchase date. In some cases, the manufacturer does not even want the defective product back. A simple matter of trust between the manufacturer and dealer. These product types are generally the mass market stuff... small/inexpensive pumps, water garden filters, underwater lights, etc.

(2) Other manufacturers require a phone consultation prior to issuing a return authorization. In this case, the manufacturer simply wants an opportunity to evaluate the defect with the dealer in an effort to ensure that there is an actual problem, and not some "other" configuration issue which may impact performace. These products are usually more expensive, and include bead filters, some brands of UV systems, etc.

(3) Some manufacturers will not authorize their dealer base to do any warranty claims at all. All product claims must be processed through the manufacturer, either by the customer or through the dealer as a representative of the customer. One comes to mind in particular. If you have ever purchased and Aqua Ultraviolet, you find that the documentation is very clear on this. Aqua UV does, however, have a trained staff answering calls, ready to help customers and dealers with any problems they may have. They can and do authorize warranties over the phone, without actually seeing the product first. Typically not a problem, expect of course if your UV light goes out after hours or on a weekend! In any event, this protocol is similiar to #2, except that the manufacturer (for some reason) documents their desire for the customer to contact them first.

(4) And lastly... a few manufacturers do not authorize their dealer base to process any warranties claims, and further will not honor any warranties without first examining and/or testing the product. In this case, the customer and/or dealer must return the product to the manufacturer for evaluation... no exceptions. There are, to some extent, valid reasons for this. For example, it is not economically feasable to replace an entire pump should a relatively inexpensive bearing fail prematurely. Unfoirtunately, Murphy's Law usually prevails here... your bearings are more likey to fail on the hottest day of the year, on a Saturday, when you live 600 miles from the nearest dealer! In any event, with this protocol, the dealer must make an evaluation of the product's performace, its place in the market, his margin relative to competative choices, etc, and then weigh these benefits against the losses he may inccur for either replacing defects on his own or suffering the loss of a customer.

Regards,
Bill
Bill D is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005   #68 (permalink)
Honmei
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,526
JG,
you stated there was in each "industry" a "standard of operating"....bill d has given the different "standards"....could you please find out from the body that governs the pond/koi hobby which one they utilize.... if you CAN NOT, could you find any literature that The Lim Corporration published prior to their New policy that states who is responsible for returning the pumps that are fouund defective and whether 2 years was the published amount of time that they were allowed to determine if a pump is defective and then replace it.
the Dealer here did not need to figure out how to test to see if the pump was defective...near as i can figure he pegged it right. But the maunfacturer did not have a clue...for 2 years he did not have a clue.

None of the negative aspects of this interaction between consumer/dealer/manufacturer was the result of anyone but the MANUFACTURER.
it is very good to see that Lim has placed that aspect of his business under another person's control and a more accepted model for dealing with equipment that is considered to be deficient by the consumer or dealer.
I respect him for that.
I have spoken to lim about somethings which I found, which weren't how he felt or his products worked, and he would not try and see if I had a valid point, but would only express his veiwpoint...

And his worse Standard response was, "No. I cannot tell you that. That is secret. ytou must give me $100,00 for me to tell you that...NO $1,000,000 would be better."
luke frisbee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005   #69 (permalink)
Tosai
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 23
Thanks, Bill, for probably the most informative thing posted on this thread for a while.

JG, I did thank Steve for if it were not for him, I would not have a pump that works. However, based on his test results and explanation, it is clear to me that he was doing it to clear William's name. He found fault in the consumer, the dealer and Waterways and left out William, the manufacturer of the pump (who also knew ahead of time that his pumps that were made around the time my pump was made had a defective molding problem). He stated he is a friend of William's and it is my opinion that he did this to help William out, not me. William was under the gun and Steve (as well as others who viewed the video clip) knew the pump leaked. William was given no responsibility in Steve's report. If it were not for that slanted report, I would have given Steve complete acknowledgement for his efforts. Instead, I thanked him for getting me a working pump yet questioned his integrity. I know some of you are friends with him and find that inappropriate, but I am just calling it as I see it and basing it on the above explanation.

As for you opinion that the dealer should have taken care of it, I guess I can't really argue whether that is correct or not or if it is an industry standard as you state. I am not in the industry. I didn't find Valarcs Walmart example to be valid so I expressed other examples which show a different process. I have also stated that it would have been nice (from a consumer's standpoint) if the dealer gave me a pump on the front end. I think Bill clearly expressed how different manufacturer warranty processes work. I think Williams falls (or fell) into number 4. And in requiring that the pump be brought to him for testing, he conducted a faulty test of the pump and falsely diagnosed the pump to be OK. That is were I find fault in William. The end result is good as far as I am concerned. I have a working pump, readers got to read about the problems I had with William Lim and William has learned how to properly test his pumps.
SCVkoiboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2005   #70 (permalink)
Honmei
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,526
Everyone do this for just a second.....Imagine both these scenarios....
A dealer Does trade out a lim pump when it is clearly defective.....and then has to do all this to get credit for the pump...yeah that'd go over like a fart in church...lim wouldn't have any dealers that had to gone through that process..

And imagine how a manufacturer could keep people selling his pumps ....maybe establish a process of returning the pumps that does not involve the dealer?

and I Have a lim pump in th side yard...given to me because the motor went bad and lim said it wasn't his problem....it is a cool housing..


And now there are some good efficient pump manufacturers out there that already have quality customer service....
luke frisbee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polygeyser vs Alpha 1 and Pump recommendations CBRS2K General Koi Forum 36 05-15-2007 11:08 AM
Broken Pump or Blocked Pipe? androal General Koi Forum 7 03-26-2007 03:07 PM
Defect In Dragon Pumps SCVkoiboy General Koi Forum 41 10-20-2005 05:38 AM
Dragon Pump Update schildkoi General Koi Forum 5 10-08-2005 08:04 AM
Dragon Pump Tom C General Koi Forum 112 09-23-2005 11:41 AM



©2008 Koi-Bito Magazine