here is an excerpt from this link,
http://www.ebmonline.org/cgi/content/full/228/6/724
It proves irrefutably that val's cockamamie ideas about FIR and biology being seperate fields is truly bad science. No real scientist would even make that suggestion, as they all know it is bunk. FIR has ALWAYS had biological and chemical effects on multitudes of things, as every real scientist knows.
Here is the excerpt.
"The biological effects of far-infrared ray (FIR) on whole organisms remain poorly understood. The aim of our study was to investigate not only the hyperthermic effect of the FIR irradiation, but also the biological effects of FIR on wound healing. To evaluate the effect of FIR on a skin wound site, the speed of full-thickness skin wound healing was compared among groups with and without FIR using a rat model. We measured the skin wound area, skin blood flow, and skin temperature before and during FIR irradiation, and we performed histological inspection. Wound healing was significantly more rapid with than without FIR. Skin blood flow and skin temperature did not change significantly before or during FIR irradiation. Histological findings revealed greater collagen regeneration and infiltration of fibroblasts that expressed transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) in wounds in the FIR group than in the group without FIR. Stimulation of the secretion of TGF-ß1 or the activation of fibroblasts may be considered as a possible mechanisms for the promotive effect of FIR on wound healing independent of skin blood flow and skin temperature.
Key Words: wound healing • far-infrared ray • transforming growth factor-ß1 • fibroblast • collagen
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
"Far-infrared ray (FIR) is an electromagnetic wave from the sun, with wavelengths ranging from 5.6 to 25.0 µm. Infrared radiation is arbitrarily subdivided into three categories: near-infrared (0.8–1.5 µm), middle-infrared (1.5–5.6 µm), and FIR radiation (5.6–1000 µm). Infrared radiation is that invisible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum adjacent to the long wavelengths, or red end, of the visible light range that extend up to the microwave range. However, they can be perceived as heat by specialized nerve endings known as thermoreceptors in the skin (
1,
2).
The skin functions primarily as a protective barrier against the environment. Injury, illness, or surgery results in the loss of integrity of large portions of the skin and leads to major disturbances of this barrier function. Delayed wound healing and dehiscence of operative wounds are significant clinical problems, and wound care is an important factor in clinical situations. Low-energy lasers, such as helium-neon and argon laser, have been used to treat wounds in several animal models (
3–
6).
Recently, much attention has been paid to its activities with regard to health and food preservation. Accumulated evidence indicates that FIR is biologically active (
7–
9). FIR has been reported to inhibit tumor growth in mice and is used for treatment of bedsores in clinical situations (
10,
11). However, there are few reports of the scientific analysis of the biological activities of FIR irradiation, with most of these being concerned with the hyperthermic effect of FIR. The biological effects of FIR on whole organisms remain poorly understood.
In this study, our aim was to investigate not only the hyperthermic effect of FIR irradiation, but also the biological effect of FIR on healing of full-thickness skin wounds using an animal model."
If you check the link
http://www.ebmonline.org/cgi/content/full/228/6/724
it even tells you what levels of radiation were needed to have such an effect. Very low, the same levels listed on FIR ceramics materials patents. In fact this experiment stresses that it was 'LOW', yet val constantly stresses it takes 'huge amounts'. Again revealing his extremely poor scientific understanding of the entire field. As well, he constantly talks about bonding and photons as things he understands, when he clearly does not. The bonding energy holding water molecules together in groups is nowhere near the force involved with holding the molecules themselves together. Stanford's latest research shows the energy level needed to seperate them and affect chemical and biological processes to be very low, as this experiment shows. In other words the clueless one, is val. I wish you would stop posting your lame hate-filled junk as 'good science', because it isn't. Learn about the field before commenting on it. I did.
In fact I worked with just those types of ceramics for sensors and capacitors for years, to overcome the issues steve brought up on another thread about probe and sensor fouling, and many many more issues. Such as Navy ship hull deposit accumulations and security applications like the ones you think do not exist. For a sensor not to foul it has to afffect chemical and biological processes around it, it does so via FIR or IR ceramics. The ray gun mentioned earlier is a submilimeter version of the same thing. Same idea just amped up quite a bit to make your skin crawl. Sensors also need to be able to transmit varying electrical signals, often self generated (piezo and ferroelectric), which affects heat and energy and magnetic fields at very low levels (all that is needed), which can be fine tuned to enhance FIR activity. As Einstein taught us, it is a wave, or frequency that has the effect, not extremely high energy. Just like sounds have frequencies, vibrations, and a wave.
Tourmaline is actually one of the most commonly used materials for those applications. The 'quacks' just took those ideas and went a slight bit over the edge with them to make some money. And some of them actually do work. That is why they can get patents. Interesting Einsteins first jon was in a patent office, yet val despises patent office science. Interesting. Guess you won't be the next Einstein. You prefer bowing to weak thought to maintain a university job, like Einstein's counterparts. Like I said, a puppet and a linear thinker. Parrots are not research scientists.
You do not know the field val. So drop it until you do. I have worked in it for over 20 years. And you, are clueless.