Except when they have been specifically designed TO bond to porous materials. The tested tensile bond strengths of Pond Shield in the lab before it was released was shown to exceed the internal strength of the concrete. This means after the epoxy had cured and an attempt to remove it was made, the concrete broke apart rather than the epoxy releasing it's grip. As far as being brittle, you are correct. Most are by their very nature brittle. We had also kept this in mind during design as well. Pond Shield is designed not be flexible enough not to mimick hairline cracks. Concrete and mortar crack over time. This is just their nature. We made sure that there was enough flexibility in the epoxy to not do the same.
With that said, I just want anyone reading this post to know that in no way was my intent to start advertising product here - even though it appears that my posts went that way. Instead, I'd like you to know that as far as our scientific research has gone, we went the total route with testing. Leaps and bounds have been made in the chemical industry and what used to be in a lot of cases no longer is. The old thoughts of the way certain plastics used to behave still exist, but the new hybrids like what we have developed have in a sense become next generation materials. I applaud anyone who does due diligence when researching the direction they plan to go in any construction medium. If you do your homework, your project is bound to turn out just as good as you planned, if not better.
KingKong, please do not take my almost immediate post and quote form your comments as anything malicious. I think, just have you have in your post that sharing information will only make us all more intelligent.
By the way it almost sounds like a new edition for Microsoft's Age of Empires