Time for this one to go outside. The title is defamatory of all judges and the content defamatory of a fellow chat room. No need for it. If you guys have personal beefs with Stephen or disagree with his statements or concerns, why not email him or call him like grown men? Oh wait, my bad, none of us r ready to act like grown men yet, sorry, carry on.
I think if we want to discuss the possibilities of judges being biased it can be done without accusing anyone in particular or deriding someone who feels vulnerable to it.
IMHO, bias is possible, especially since many of those who show post pics on the net and their koi are known and they don't always get along with some of those who judge. Some intentionally post their pics on the forums and get all sweetie pie with the judges right here on bito. Is that cheating? Should judges be forced to refrain from personal feelings or preferences, or does it lie on the people showing to not display pics of koi they intend to show or reveal details about background, history, etc? Then there is a whole seperate issue of folks who sell or breed invariably have tons of pics out there for that purpose and so their line is readily recognizable to the experienced, and they or those who show koi that look very similar may suffer in the judges eyes due to it. It's all part of the game.
I think if the question is posed, "Is it possible for a judge to know who a koi belongs to or what breeder it came from and judge unfairly due to personal feelings or views?" is asked, the answer is yes, it is. I would hope not but the potential is certainly there.
Let the fur fly. Or as my fans say, the 'fir'.