|
Morning, Jim . . .
An interesting observation. But one that's hard to quantify and qualify, surely, since # of entrants is reported but # of members entering usually isn't?
I should think that the historical perspective would teach us that the newer and smaller the show, the greater the likelihood that a high percentage of the exhibitors will be members. Maybe even 100% in the case of closed shows (vs. open shows)?
Whereas with larger and more prestigious shows, the likelihood is that a much smaller percentage of exhibitors will be members.
By way of illustration, Susan Boland reported in KoiUSA 16/5 that at MAKC's 3rd Annual Show in 1991 (your 1st GC), there were 176 koi entered by 22 members (from a total membership of over 300 families). Even this was a substantial increase over MAKC's 1st show stats (65 entries by 12 members).
And since Susan referenced 'members' (not entrants), would I be correct in guessing that these early MAKC shows were closed?
Anyone care to speculate about the ratio of members showing to the total # of entrants at MAKC's most recent show?
So I'm inclined to think that plotting these functions of Inclusion vs. Size over Time would approximate a hyperbolic curve -- at the beginning of which the club would own its show and at the end of which the show would own its club.
Maybe your healthy 50% figure would fall somewhere in the middle?
Awaiting your response,
__________________ Don
Member: AKCA, ZNA, KoiUSA, IKONA, Koi-Unit.
CHKPA
|