Home | About Us | Contact Us


Koi Forum - Koi-Bito Magazine straight from Japan
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Depth of Media in Biological Filtration Chamber

  1. #1
    Tosai
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25
    Post Thanks / Like

    Depth of Media in Biological Filtration Chamber

    Hi all,

    I've been a lurker for a long time but maybe its time to come out of my shell.

    For biological filtration using J-mat, Peter W recommended to go no deeper than 10 inches (or thereabouts) as its effect will be significantly compensated once the media is further submerged.

    My matting is currently 18cms submerged and I can definitely see healthy biofilm on the media at the bottom. I have also seen people with very high stocking using deep filtration chambers with excellent results.

    Trying to better understand where Mr W is coming from and if anyone has any experience with this?

    Thank you all!

  2. #2
    Daihonmei MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    11,264
    Post Thanks / Like
    Welcome! Too many lurkers never speak up. And that's a good question. I am not certain what all Waddy may have had in mind. I've learned that he often provides his bottom line advice without laying out all the reasons. I would expect his concern relates to maintaining high oxygen levels in the water being filtered, maximizing the nitrification process while minimizing the risk of potentially harmful heterotrophs being given a large homeland within the filter. If that is all that is behind the recommendation, then I'd say it is a rule of thumb that can be varied if the particular system is able to maintain adequate oxygen levels. Much will depend on flow rates, temperatures, etc. However, I am not sure if that is what he had in mind, or if there is more to it than that.

  3. #3
    Daihonmei dick benbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    seattle, wa
    Posts
    6,340
    Post Thanks / Like
    Shaw,
    Welcome to the board! Glad you've decided to post.

    Most media hosts the thickest colonies nearest the source of air and food. In a down flow it's on the top of your media and on an upflow it's on the bottom.
    The kind of bacteria can also be affected by the natural UV present in light especially where the downflow is used.

    The deeper the media the more it affects the flow and the availability of food and air.To take advantage.

    I have 3 vortexes in series, 16 inch media, all up flow and all with an airpump for each individual vortex. I started with air stones on top to re-introduce air into the next chamber. I then , after 2 years switched the airstones underneath the media. The results were markedly better with the later. I thought all that heavy air would blow all the food and water by too fast.
    Don't know the theory but can tell you what works in practice. I'm not gonna change my system but if i was doing a new one I wouldn't hesitate to go ten inches for media depth. I've spent time with Peter and have an enormous respect for his knowledge. It's what he runs at his home pond. I know he's been working with EA and k-i but don't believe he's changed over yet or any time soon. BTW this concept came from Sakai-san of isawa. If you ever get a chance to read up on the man and his story you should do it.

  4. #4
    Tosai
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks for your insights.

    I do not have any scientific facts to back up my thoughts but my thinking is that unless there is good reason to suspect that the quality of biofilm for the entire media is compromised, then additional depth will provide more nitrification capabilities.

    As for gas exchange issues, this can be easily fixed with aeration - can't it?

  5. #5
    Daihonmei MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    11,264
    Post Thanks / Like
    I do not think it is as simple as avoiding compromise to all the media. It also involves avoiding habitat for undesirables. Aeration should handle gas exchange issues .... trickle towers can be several feet of media and function wonderfully as long as the aeration is maintained.

  6. #6
    Daihonmei dick benbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    seattle, wa
    Posts
    6,340
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks Mike for your input, good point.

    when k-1 first came out lots of folks under the theory of if a little bit is good a big bunch is better learned that it doesn't work in application. The constant stir of the air helped to expose the media to everything the bacteria needed and when too much was applied it didn't roil the same.

Similar Threads

  1. Volume-Depth-% Water Change-Filtration-
    By kntry in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 09-11-2013, 03:55 AM
  2. 'Overactive' biological ?
    By kingkong in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-03-2012, 03:38 PM
  3. Net and filtration media disenfectant
    By Kraz-e-4-Koi in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-22-2008, 01:46 AM
  4. Best aerated media upgrade for 3-chamber vortex
    By androal in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-05-2006, 09:05 PM
  5. Biological filtration
    By Vogata in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-24-2006, 06:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Articles - Sitemap - FAQs and Rules

KB Footer Graphic
Straight from Japan... For the serious hobbyist!
All content and images copyright of: Koi-bito.com