Home | About Us | Contact Us


Koi Forum - Koi-Bito Magazine straight from Japan
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 72

Thread: Nitrate

  1. #21
    Daihonmei MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    11,286
    Late night reading... there is an Environmental Protection Agency publication dealing with application of liquid livestock wastes in which it is noted that in certain tests involving surface application on soil, when the liquid was directly applied there was a loss of 10%-25% of total nitrogen through volatilization. When the liquid was applied by sprinklers, the loss was 15%-40%. Apparently the only difference was the spraying of the liquid rather than pouring... but not entirely clear. I want to track down an article in the Journal of Environmental Quality, 1997, by R.R. Sharpe and L.A. Harper entitled: "Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Sprinkler Irrigation of Swine Effluent." ... Sounds exciting, no?

  2. #22
    Daihonmei
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,642
    "Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Sprinkler Irrigation of Swine Effluent." ... Sounds exciting, no?

    God help us both------ Yes. Best, JR

  3. #23
    Oyagoi Eugeneg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Near Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,878

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by JasPR View Post
    "Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Sprinkler Irrigation of Swine Effluent." ... Sounds exciting, no?

    God help us both------ Yes. Best, JR
    And all the other readers
    Regards
    Eugene

  4. #24
    Oyagoi kingkong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    2,042

    Talking

    Nitrous Oxide? are you sure it was Nitrous.... gas

    What you could do is study Nitrosomonous bacteria to find the ideal conditions for its growth and work backwards. It seems to have its likes and dislikes. Ex.

    Converts ammonia to Nitrite
    Avoids light if at all possible-hides under slime
    Has an aerobic metabolism
    In order to cell divide, it requires vast amounts of ammonia
    Becomes dormant when starved
    Significant time and energy required to re-activate
    Premature commitment to short Ammonia source can kill bacteria
    When dormant becomes mobile or free-float
    Can not tolerate anaerobic bacteria (hydrogen sulphide)
    Requires some Oxygen but loves Ammonia

  5. #25
    Daihonmei
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,642
    yep, as in laughing gas. it is a natural byproduct of that biological process.

    Not sure I grasp you point about nitrifiers ( you might have the wrong species there to begin with?) . Our curiosity is regarding declining nitrAte in aerobic filters when performed in TTs. If you are suggesting that somehow the nitrifiers are struggling then we would see nitrIte and ammonia rise? Is that what you are saying? JR

  6. #26
    Daihonmei MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    11,286
    I've found the Journal of Environmental Quality in the libraries of a couple of agricultural colleges with whom I get access through an inter-library service. The article will be faxed tomorrow if 4th of July vacation schedules don't get in the way. It truly is crazy to be eager to learn intimate details of PS. But, it will likely be disappointing.

  7. #27
    Daihonmei MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    11,286
    The Sharpe & Harper article is only 5 pages long, but it is 5 pages requiring focused study to fully comprehend, and I am not at that point, yet. The general findings are worthwhile, nonetheless. The study was conducted at a swine production facility in Georgia with a capacity of 10,000 animals. Waste "was deposited by the animals into a below-floor temporary sump that was pumped into the primary (no. 1) lagoon about every 15 min." The lagoon system was unique in that effluent proceeded sequentially through a series of four lagoons before use from the no. 4 lagoon, either for flushing the house floors or for irrigation..." The irrigation system was one which sprayed the effluent water above the crop, which was oats. (For animal feed, no doubt!) Irrigation used 29,000 cubic meters of effluent. "Micrometeorological instrumentation" was used to capture data on wind direction and wind profiles, and a range of other conditions were recorded. Effluent sprayed on the crop was captured in glass containers for measurement. Nitrogen levels were measured at the irrigation spigots (sprayheads). Soil water was tested at 4 locations at 4 separate depths at each location, with the probes providing measurements every 15 minutes over the course of the measuring period. Atmospheric ammonia concentrations were sampled and measured. Nitrous oxide concentrations were measured continually during and after irrigations "using tunable laser spectroscopy". The tests were conducted on three occasions, with each testing period lasting multiple days. .... I report all of this simply to convey the thoroughness of Sharpe & Harper.

    Their findings include:

    1) 13% of NH4-N in the effluent was lost as NH3 volatilization before reaching the crop or soil surface.

    2) Within a 24-hour period, 82% of NH4-N was lost to the atmosphere.

    3) "After accounting for gaseous losses of NH3... and N2O ...only about 24% of the total N (4% of NH3) remained in the soil.... Such large losses make it difficult to base effluent irrigation recommendations on N concentrations."

    4) "These data indicate that NH3 emissions made a greater contribution to atmospheric N-loading pollution than N2O emissions."

    It appears that warmer temperatures and higher wind speeds increase the loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere. Compared to prior studies involving soil application of slurries, the total loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere was greater and more rapid. The authors suggest a probability that overhead spraying of liquid results in rapid volatilization of the nitrogeneous compounds compared to other methods.

    I need to read over the study a few more times before posting more. But, first I need 2 aspirin and a rest.
    Last edited by MikeM; 07-03-2007 at 03:52 PM. Reason: correct typo

  8. #28
    Oyagoi Eugeneg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Near Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,878
    I need to read over the study a few more times before posting more. But, first I need 2 aspirin and a rest.[/quote]
    Mike
    There was an article in Rinko and it concluded that if at least 10% water change was done daily there would not be a problem with Nitrate build up .
    That is good enough for me as I also flush vortec daily as well as water is run through a canal with bare root plants . Nitrate is not relly that harmfull with small spikes as the biggest harm is the skin quality . In no way are concentrations like on a pig farm .
    Regards
    Eugene

  9. #29
    Daihonmei MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    11,286
    Yep, Eugene. If we all did 10% per day water changes, we would not need the sophisticated filter systems we use. Constant flow is even better.

    Since my nitrate levels are below 5ppm most days, I have no real reason to be concerned either. But, I'm a curious sort of person. You would not believe the time I spent trying to understand the material differences in the construction of the petals of Tillandsia and Vriesea, which only became worse when the genus Alcantarea was carved out of Vriesea... worthless knowledge that comes to mind whenever I'm working in the shadehouse. .... a few small differences enriching life.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	unsorted photos 650.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	143.2 KB 
ID:	13865   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	unsorted photos 652.jpg 
Views:	104 
Size:	148.6 KB 
ID:	13866   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	unsorted photos 653.jpg 
Views:	104 
Size:	152.9 KB 
ID:	13867   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	unsorted photos 654.jpg 
Views:	100 
Size:	144.2 KB 
ID:	13868  

  10. #30
    Oyagoi kingkong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    2,042

    just a little background

    Pig vs. Fish .....round 1 of Urea vs. Ammonia
    Just so there is some understanding of the basic chemistry of waste, it might make the pain easier to handle.
    Fish release nitrogen as free Ammonia (NH3) which is very toxic and would kill a land organism if not promptly removed. Fish are the only members of the animal kingdom to excrete nitrogen this way. Since they are surrounded by water, they can convert the amino group to Ammonia and then release it via the gills into their environment.
    Pigs, along with all land animals, deal with nitrogen in a completely different way. To avoid the toxic Ammonia, they convert the amino group into Urea via the liver. Once synthesized, it is then released from the pig as urea or (NH2)2CO. This is a combination of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen.
    Now we are trying to compare the volatility of Ammonia to Urea as it enters the atmosphere. Could there be any correlation drawn...I don't know.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Nitrate Effects
    By MikeM in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-06-2016, 11:40 AM
  2. still confused about nitrAte...yes or no?
    By moikoi in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 01-31-2016, 09:54 PM
  3. Nitrate
    By kingkong in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 04:40 PM
  4. Lower the nitrate
    By Stefan72 in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-21-2008, 11:19 PM
  5. Chlorine and Nitrate
    By MikeM in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-16-2008, 03:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Articles - Sitemap - FAQs and Rules

KB Footer Graphic
Straight from Japan... For the serious hobbyist!
All content and images copyright of: Koi-bito.com